Corrections, Appeals and Complaints Policy

Pediatric interventional pulmonology is committed to maintaining the integrity and quality of published research. This policy outlines the procedures for handling corrections, appeals, and complaints related to published content, ensuring a transparent and fair process for all stakeholders.

Corrections

  1. Types of Corrections

    • Errata: Minor errors that do not affect the overall conclusions of the research. These are typically typographical errors or minor factual inaccuracies.
    • Corrections: Significant errors that affect the interpretation of the data or conclusions of the research but do not invalidate the entire study.
    • Retractions: Major errors or issues that invalidate the research, often due to serious misconduct or issues affecting the study’s validity.

  2. Process for Requesting a Correction

    • Authors, readers, or reviewers who identify a need for a correction should submit a written request to the editorial office, detailing the nature of the error and the necessary correction.
    • The editorial team will review the request and determine the appropriate action, which may include issuing a correction notice or a retraction if warranted.
    • The corrected article and the correction notice will be published on the journal’s website, and a clear link to the correction will be provided from the original article.

  3. Responsibility for Corrections

    • The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that any errors or issues in their published work are reported promptly and addressed appropriately.

Appeals

  1. Grounds for Appeal

    • Authors may appeal editorial decisions related to the acceptance or rejection of their manuscripts. Appeals should be based on substantive reasons, such as procedural errors or new evidence that was not previously available.

  2. Process for Filing an Appeal

    • Authors wishing to appeal a decision must submit a formal written appeal to the editorial office. The appeal should include a clear explanation of the grounds for the appeal and any supporting documentation or evidence.
    • The appeal will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated senior editor who was not involved in the original decision. A response to the appeal will be provided within a reasonable timeframe.

  3. Outcome of Appeals

    • The outcome of the appeal may result in a reaffirmation of the original decision, a reversal of the decision, or a request for additional review or reconsideration of the manuscript.

Complaints

  1. Types of Complaints

    • Editorial Process Complaints: Concerns about the handling of a manuscript, including delays, procedural issues, or perceived bias.
    • Ethical Concerns: Issues related to research ethics, such as plagiarism, authorship disputes, or conflicts of interest.
    • Publication Errors: Complaints related to errors in published articles, such as inaccuracies or misrepresentations.

  2. Process for Filing a Complaint

    • Complaints should be submitted in writing to the editorial office, including a detailed description of the issue and any relevant evidence or documentation.
    • The editorial team will acknowledge receipt of the complaint and investigate the issue in a timely manner.

  3. Handling and Resolution of Complaints

    • Complaints will be reviewed impartially by the editorial team or a designated committee. A thorough investigation will be conducted to address the concerns raised.
    • The complainant will be informed of the outcome and any actions taken as a result of the investigation. The resolution may include issuing a correction, apology, or other appropriate actions.

Confidentiality and Fairness

  1. Confidentiality

    • All matters related to corrections, appeals, and complaints will be handled with the utmost confidentiality to protect the privacy of all parties involved.

  2. Fairness

    • The process for handling corrections, appeals, and complaints will be conducted fairly and transparently, ensuring that all parties have an opportunity to present their case and that decisions are based on evidence and established policies.